How to Write a Seminar Paper Introduction: Structure, Length and an Example
A seminar paper introduction tells the reader what the topic is, what problem the paper deals with and what its research question is, then says why it matters and how the paper is organized. It works like a funnel: it starts with the broad topic and narrows down to the exact question. In a seminar paper the introduction takes roughly one to three pages, depending on your guidelines, and its final version is best written last, once you know what the paper actually found.
What the introduction has to do
By the end of the introduction the reader, usually your lecturer, should know three things: what the paper is about, what it asks, and why it is worth reading. That is why it is built like a funnel (the USC Libraries writing guide calls it an inverted triangle): a broad first paragraph about the field, then a gradual narrowing to a specific problem, to a gap in what is known about it, and finally to the research question.
In many institutions the introduction is not the place for the full literature review, and not the place for findings. It mentions a few key sources briefly to show the problem is real, and leaves the detail to the chapters that follow. This isn't a universal rule, though: the Open University of Israel's guide (2003, department of management and economics) lets you weave the literature into the introduction or present it in a separate chapter right after it, so check what your guidelines ask for.
The five parts of an introduction, in order
- Topic and background. One paragraph that orients the reader: what the field is and what is generally known. A good first sentence starts with a fact or a phenomenon, not a dictionary definition.
- The problem or gap. What is still unknown, disputed, or has changed. A few sources go here to show the problem exists.
- Research question and aim. One clear sentence, usually at or near the end of the introduction. If you have hypotheses, they go here or in a separate chapter, depending on your guidelines.
- Significance. Why the answer matters: to research, to practitioners, or to the people the topic affects.
- Structure of the paper. A short paragraph on what each chapter contains: "Chapter one... chapter two...".
| Part | What to write | Rough length |
|---|---|---|
| Topic and background | The field and the phenomenon, in plain words | One paragraph |
| Problem and gap | What is unknown or disputed, with a few sources | One or two paragraphs |
| Question and aim | The exact question the paper answers | 2 to 3 sentences |
| Significance | Who the answer helps, and how | A short paragraph |
| Structure | What each chapter contains | 3 to 5 sentences |
These are the common parts, but some guides also ask for the research method and the paper's limits. The Open University's guide asks for both, and Tel-Hai College's guidelines for a master's programme in education management ask for a short description of the methodology and the reason for choosing the topic. If your guidelines ask for this too, a natural place is right after the research question.
A sample introduction
The topic in this example is made up, and the places that need a source are marked (Author, Year). In a real introduction those are the sources you read, in the citation style your lecturer asked for.
Topic and background In recent years more and more students work alongside their studies, and many of them work changing shifts (Author, Year). Work helps pay for a degree, but it also shrinks the time left for studying.
Problem and gap Earlier studies found a link between weekly working hours and academic achievement (Author, Year; Author, Year). Most of them, however, looked at a fixed number of hours, and few examined what happens when shifts change from week to week and make regular study times hard to keep.
Research question This paper examines whether working changing shifts is related to undergraduate students' grade average, and what role planning study time plays in that relationship.
Significance Understanding the link can help institutions tailor support for working students, and help students build a study week that fits their shifts.
Structure Chapter one reviews the literature on working while studying. Chapter two describes the method. Chapter three presents the findings, and chapter four discusses them and concludes.
Notice that the introduction does not reveal what was found: the answer to the research question is kept for the findings and discussion chapters. That is how many departments want it. At Tel Aviv University's Bible department, for example, the introduction should raise interest and not offer solutions. Other guidelines differ: in Tel-Hai's master's guidelines, a short summary of the main findings is part of the introduction. If yours ask for a summary like that, keep it short and leave the detail to the later chapters. How to write the discussion for this same paper, with the same example, is in the guide to writing the discussion and conclusion.
How long should the introduction be?
One rule of thumb is about a tenth of the paper, not counting appendices and the reference list. Treat it as a rough estimate: the Israeli guides we read state no percentage, and the length of the paper itself varies. At Tel Aviv University's Bible department it is about 20 to 25 pages, and elsewhere it can be shorter or longer. In the Open University guide, the examples are a one-page introduction, or a three-page one that includes the theoretical background. Your institution's or lecturer's guidelines beat any rule of thumb, so check them first. The numbers in the table are also our own rough estimate, not any institution's rule.
| Type of paper | Paper length (rough estimate) | Introduction (rough estimate) |
|---|---|---|
| Regular course paper | 8 to 12 pages | Half a page to a page |
| Seminar paper | 20 to 25 pages | 1 to 3 pages |
| Thesis | 50+ pages | 3 to 6 pages |
When to write the introduction
The easy way is to write it twice. At the start, write a short draft that helps you sharpen the research question and becomes the base of your proposal. At the end, once the discussion and conclusion are written, rewrite it so it promises exactly what the paper did. An introduction written only at the start often promises things the paper never got to.
How to open: sentences that work and ones to skip
| Instead of | Better |
|---|---|
| "Since the dawn of time, people have..." | A current, precise fact about the field, with a source |
| "The dictionary defines X as..." | The definition used in the field, from an academic source |
| "In this paper I will try to examine..." | "This paper examines whether..." |
| A rhetorical question as the first line | Present the phenomenon; ask the question later |
These are recommendations, not laws: the University of North Carolina Writing Center warns against sweeping openings and dictionary definitions, but also lists a thought-provoking question as a possible opening, and reminds you that no opening suits every field.
Five common introduction mistakes
- An introduction that is too long. When it grows, the literature review has usually crept in. Move the detail to the review chapter, if your guidelines have one.
- Giving away the findings when nobody asked. In many departments the introduction presents the question, not the answer.
- A vague research question. "This paper is about student employment" is a topic, not a question. A good question says what you examine, in whom, and which relationship you are looking for.
- An introduction that doesn't match the conclusion. If the paper ends up answering something other than what the introduction promised, rewrite the introduction.
- Claims without sources. Every claim about the world, like "more students work today", needs a source.
Introduction vs conclusion
| Comparison | Introduction | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Direction | From general to specific | From specific back to general |
| What it contains | Topic, problem, question, significance, structure | Answer to the question, conclusions, recommendations |
| Findings | Usually not | Yes, briefly |
| When the final version is written | Last | Last |
A good introduction is written over a few short sessions, not in one night before the deadline. In Focusity you can add the seminar paper with its due date, and the app splits it into writing sessions in your free hours. For the whole paper, step by step, there is also the full seminar paper guide.
Split my paper into sessionsFrequently asked questions
What goes in a seminar paper introduction?
Usually five parts, in order: the topic and background, the problem or gap in what is known, the research question and aim, why the answer matters, and a short paragraph on how the paper is organized. Some guides also ask for the research method and the paper's limits, so check yours.
How many pages should the introduction be?
As a rough estimate, one to three pages in a seminar paper. Your institution's or lecturer's guidelines come first.
Do you write the introduction first or last?
Both. Write a short draft at the start to sharpen the research question, then rewrite it at the end so it promises exactly what the paper did.
Does the introduction include sources?
Yes, but in many institutions only a few: some key sources that show the problem exists, with the full literature review in its own chapter. Some guidelines let you weave the literature into the introduction, so check yours.
Where does the research question go in the introduction?
Usually at or near the end, after the topic and the problem. That way the reader reaches it already understanding why it matters.
What is the difference between an introduction and an abstract?
The abstract summarizes the whole paper, including the method and findings, usually in one or two paragraphs. The introduction presents the topic, the problem and the question, and in many departments does not reveal what was found, unless your guidelines ask for a short summary of findings.
A big paper, split into hours
Focusity builds a weekly study plan inside your free time, by each course's deadlines and difficulty. Free, on iPhone, Android and the web.
Build my plan — free